Enterasys brim-f6 Benutzerhandbuch

Seite von 132
Ethernet
6-10
Ethernet Workgroup Design
The media selected for the network is inexpensive Category 3 UTP jumper 
cabling. The low cost, durability, and ready availability of UTP makes it by far the 
preferred media for this installation. If there were specific electrical noise or 
distance considerations, the Network Designer may have decided to attempt a 
design using multimode fiber optic cabling or other media. This media selection 
removes the SEH-22FL, a fiber optic device, from the selection field.
As this is a small home office that does not plan to grow substantially, the ability 
to expand the network is not a primary concern. As there is no apparent need or 
desire to quickly and easily expand the network, the stackable products in the 
selection field are not required. Again, if later criteria prove that the remaining 
devices in the selection field do not measure up to the network’s needs, these can 
be reintroduced to the selection field.
The easiest decision in the process of home office network design is the 
comparison of required port count (the number of stations that will be part of the 
network) and the port count supplied by the devices in the selection field. In the 
case of this example, the comparison indicates that the one remaining device in 
the selection field, the MR9T-E, provides three more 10BASE-T networking 
station ports than the network requires. The MR9T-E, therefore, meets all of the 
criteria judged to be important for this network. 
Product
Type
Max 
Management
Media
Port Count
PIMs/BRIMs
MR9T-E
repeater
NONE
UTP
8
1 EPIM
SEH-22/32
stackable
NONE
UTP
12
1 EPIM
SEH-24/34
stackable
NONE
UTP
24
2 EPIMs
SEH-22FL
stackable
NONE
Multimode 
Fiber Optics
12
1 EPIM
Product
Type
Max 
Management
Media
Port Count
PIMs/BRIMs
MR9T-E
repeater
NONE
UTP
8
1 EPIM