ZyXEL Communications P-335WT User Manual

Page of 485
P-335 Series User’s Guide
Appendix I Wireless LANs
466
Key differences between WPA(2) and WEP are improved data encryption and user 
authentication.
Encryption 
Both WPA and WPA2 improve data encryption by using Temporal Key Integrity Protocol 
(TKIP), Message Integrity Check (MIC) and IEEE 802.1x. In addition to TKIP, WPA2 also 
uses Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) in the Counter mode with Cipher block chaining 
Message authentication code Protocol (CCMP) to offer stronger encryption. 
Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) uses 128-bit keys that are dynamically generated and 
distributed by the authentication server. It includes a per-packet key mixing function, a 
Message Integrity Check (MIC) named Michael, an extended initialization vector (IV) with 
sequencing rules, and a re-keying mechanism.
TKIP regularly changes and rotates the encryption keys so that the same encryption key is 
never used twice. The RADIUS server distributes a Pairwise Master Key (PMK) key to the AP 
that then sets up a key hierarchy and management system, using the pair-wise key to 
dynamically generate unique data encryption keys to encrypt every data packet that is 
wirelessly communicated between the AP and the wireless clients. This all happens in the 
background automatically.
WPA2 AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) is a block cipher that uses a 256-bit 
mathematical algorithm called Rijndael.
The Message Integrity Check (MIC) is designed to prevent an attacker from capturing data 
packets, altering them and resending them. The MIC provides a strong mathematical function 
in which the receiver and the transmitter each compute and then compare the MIC. If they do 
not match, it is assumed that the data has been tampered with and the packet is dropped. 
By generating unique data encryption keys for every data packet and by creating an integrity 
checking mechanism (MIC), TKIP makes it much more difficult to decode data on a Wi-Fi 
network than WEP, making it difficult for an intruder to break into the network. 
The encryption mechanisms used for WPA and WPA-PSK are the same. The only difference 
between the two is that WPA-PSK uses a simple common password, instead of user-specific 
credentials. The common-password approach makes WPA-PSK susceptible to brute-force 
password-guessing attacks but it's still an improvement over WEP as it employs an easier-to-
use, consistent, single, alphanumeric password.