Cisco Cisco Email Security Appliance C370 Release Notes

Page of 3
 
2
Release Notes for Hot Patch 1 for Cisco IronPort AsyncOS 7.6.1 for Email Security
  Resolved Issues
Resolved Issues
The following issues are resolved in this release: 
Additional Information 
For additional information about Cisco IronPort AsyncOS 7.6.1 for Email Security, see the Release 
Notes at 
Service and Support
You can request our support by phone, email, or online 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. 
During customer support hours (24 hours per day, Monday through Friday excluding U.S. holidays), an 
engineer will contact you within an hour of your request. 
Table 1
Resolved Issues in this release of AsyncOS for Email Security
Defect ID
Description
81090
AsyncOS 7.6.1 for Email Hot Patch Includes Expired Version of Sophos 
Anti-Virus
The version of Sophos Anti-Virus included in this hot patch release has expired. You 
will receive an alert notifying you of the expired version after you upgrade your 
appliance to this build. 
The appliance will automatically download the latest version of Sophos Anti-Virus 
from the upgrade server after the upgrade is complete. There will be little to no impact 
on anti-virus scanning performance.
86322
Fixed: AsyncOS 7.6.1 Does Not Allow 169.254.0.0/16 Addresses for Destination 
Domains
The 
169.254.0.0/16
 IP address block is reserved for link-local addressing in IPv4; 
however, this address block can be used by organizations on isolated networks. 
Previous versions of AsyncOS 7.6 considered these IP addresses to be invalid and did 
not route messages to mail gateways with these addresses. It would return error 
message saying that the domain’s MX records were invalid.
This issue has been resolved. The Email Security appliance will now route messages 
to gateways that have an IP address from this block.
77819
Fixed: SMTP Route for Top Level Domain Ignored Due to Partial Subdomain 
Entry
Previously, the Email Security appliance would not route a message to the SMTP 
route defined for a top level domain if there was another SMTP route entry for a 
partial domain that had the same top level domain. The appliance would instead use 
the default route or use MX for sending the messageThe appliance would instead use 
the default route or use MX for sending the message. For example, the appliance 
would not send an email message for 
joe@example.co.jp
 to the SMTP route defined 
for the top level domain 
.jp
 if there was an SMTP route entry for 
.test.co.jp
, even 
though they only share the top level domain. This issue has been resolved.