Cisco Cisco Aironet 1572EC Outdoor Access Point White Paper
![Cisco](https://files.manualsbrain.com/attachments/7380d0050044647c30f5c24bbbf5d0c0b6d9bb84/common/fit/150/50/faa183d287233c52228cfea3dbc2a127fe780f60564fcb0955d9c3d1cd23/brand_logo.png)
Copyright © 2015 Miercom Cisco Aironet 1570 Access Point
Page 5
iPhone 6 testing. Five Apple iPhone 6s were
placed on a table at Location 1
placed on a table at Location 1
– 500 feet
down-range from the APs. Five more iPhones
were placed on a table at Location 2, 350 feet.
were placed on a table at Location 2, 350 feet.
Multiple test runs were conducted to measure
the throughput performance of all the phones.
the throughput performance of all the phones.
The average was taken of two test runs, per
AP, for each of the five phones at one table.
This was then repeated with the five phones at
the second table. Then an average of two test
runs for all ten phones was taken.
AP, for each of the five phones at one table.
This was then repeated with the five phones at
the second table. Then an average of two test
runs for all ten phones was taken.
connected in different locations and with different
orientations.
orientations.
The clients were all Apple's latest iPhone 6. Ten
of the iPhone 6 phones were deployed outside
on two tables, five per table, with a good line-of-
sight access to the AP. One table was situated
at 350 feet from the AP, the other at 500 feet, as
shown in the diagram to the right.
of the iPhone 6 phones were deployed outside
on two tables, five per table, with a good line-of-
sight access to the AP. One table was situated
at 350 feet from the AP, the other at 500 feet, as
shown in the diagram to the right.
The iPhones were set at vertical and horizontal
orientations (see below). The tables and phones
were positioned at various angles to mimic a real
world scenario, with fairly good signal conditions
at each location.
orientations (see below). The tables and phones
were positioned at various angles to mimic a real
world scenario, with fairly good signal conditions
at each location.
Figure 6: Table on Location 1 with Five
iPhone 6 Phones in Multiple Orientations
iPhone 6 Phones in Multiple Orientations
Figure 7: Table on Location 2 with Five
iPhone 6 Phones in Multiple Orientations
iPhone 6 Phones in Multiple Orientations
Outperforming outdoors.
The average downlink
throughput per iPhone 6 is
shown for: 1) five phones at
500 feet, 2) five phones at
350 feet and 3) all ten
phones operating at the
same time. The Cisco
Aironet 1572 effectively
delivers double the per-client
throughput of the Aruba
AP-275 and the Ruckus
T300 for the phones at
500 feet, and with all phones
operating concurrently.
The average downlink
throughput per iPhone 6 is
shown for: 1) five phones at
500 feet, 2) five phones at
350 feet and 3) all ten
phones operating at the
same time. The Cisco
Aironet 1572 effectively
delivers double the per-client
throughput of the Aruba
AP-275 and the Ruckus
T300 for the phones at
500 feet, and with all phones
operating concurrently.
Figure 8: 802.11ac Outdoor Performance and Consistency
iPhone 6 phones on two tables at 500’ and 300’
80.37
85.91
75.98
28.42
67.59
39.56
44.48
41.37
36.11
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
T1-500 feet
(5 iPhones)
T2-300 feet
(5 iPhones)
T-Both
(10 iPhones)
Mb
p
s
Performance at 500', 300' and both together
Cisco AP
1572i
1572i
Aruba
AP-275
AP-275
Ruckus
T300
T300
Figure 5: Outdoor Multi-Client Performance
and Consistency Aerial View
and Consistency Aerial View