Cisco Cisco Universal Small Cell 5030 Licensing Information

> We would like to use your dnsmasq application in one of our Small Cell

> products but it is not clear to us whether the GPLv2 or GPLv3 licencing

> terms stated in the two COPYING files are disjunctive or conjunctive.

> i.e. Can we choose whether to use it under GPLv2 licencing only, or are

> parts of it also licenced under GPLv3 and hence we must respect the most

> restrictive licence.

>

> I found your post from back in 2007 where you were asking for opinions

> on what should be done:

> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2007q3/001566.html

>

> I cannot find the conclusion of this discussion but I think you chose

> option 3 (disjunctive licence) as your CHANGELOG has the comment “Added

> GPL version 3 as a licence option”, hence we can choose to only apply

> the GPLv2 licence.

>

> I welcome your clarification.

>

> Best regards,

>

> Damian

>

> http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo02.jpg

>

> *Damian Le Gresley*

> Senior Software Engineering Manager

> Small Cells Technology Group

 

    GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE

       Version 2, June 1991

 

Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

    59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA  02111-1307  USA

Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies

of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

 

    Preamble

 

 The licenses for most software are designed to take away your

freedom to share and change it.  By contrast, the GNU General Public

License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free

software--to make sure the software is free for all its users.  This

General Public License applies to most of the Free Software

Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to