Cisco Cisco IP Contact Center Release 4.6.1 Design Guide

Page of 388
 
7-22
Cisco Unified Contact Center Enterprise 7.0, 7.1, and 7.2 SRND
OL-8669-16
Chapter 7      Cisco Unified Expert Advisor Option
Recommendations for Deploying Unified Expert Advisor
In cases where Runtime Server A is expected to be down or disconnected for an extended period of time, 
it would be best to reverse the priorities in the SIP proxy server's static route table so that the backup 
runtime server rather than the primary runtime server receives the first invite. It is important to remember 
to restore the original priorities once the primary server is back online.
Another important reason to get the primary runtime server up and running as soon as possible is that 
OAMP is accessible as long as the primary runtime server is running, even if it is in Partial Service. 
There is currently no way to promote the backup runtime server to primary.
Route Pattern or Route Point
When you configure the method in which calls are delivered from Cisco Unified CM to Unified CCE, 
you have two decisions to make. First, do you configure the dialed number to go through a route pattern 
via a SIP trunk to Unified CVP, or do you configure it to go through a route point to Unified ICM? 
Second, once the call reaches Unified ICM and begins a routing script, do you force it to transfer to 
Unified CVP even if no queuing is required?
This section discusses the trade-offs involved.
  •
If the call is routed through a route point, if the routing script does not contain any SendToVRU node 
or RunExternalScript node prior to the Queue node, and if expert advisors are available in the 
referenced skill groups (meaning no queueing is necessary), then the SIP Invite will flow from Cisco 
Unified CM directly to Unified Expert Advisor and will bypass Unified CVP. This means that 
Unified CVP ports will not be tied up unnecessarily, but the extra functionality that Unified CVP 
provides (such as simulated ring tone, re-query in case of failure, and re-query in case of time-out) 
will not be available.
  •
If any of the above conditions is not true, then a SIP dialog will be established between Cisco 
Unified CM and Unified CVP, and another SIP dialog will be established between Unified CVP and 
Unified Expert Advisor. All the Unified CVP functionality is available in this case, but be aware that 
one Unified CVP port and license remain tied up through the life of the call (until both the caller 
and the expert advisor disconnect).
In addition, the call should always be routed through a route point if it is coming from a Unified CCE 
agent in the form of a consult, conference, or transfer. This allows Unified CCE to track this call as a 
part of the original call that is being handled by the Unified CCE agent.
Given these trade-offs, the best practice in most cases is for the call to be routed through a route point 
first, but for the routing script to include at least a SendToVRU node prior to the Queue node. This 
provides the best reporting and the best call handling functionality, but at the expense of the possibly 
unnecessary use of a Unified CVP port license for the life of the call.
Also, in deployments that include Cisco Unified CM as a communications manager that does not host 
Unified CCE agents, there might be no Unified CM PG at all. In that case, all calls from Cisco 
Unified CM to Unified CCE must go through a route pattern to a SIP trunk to Unified CVP. There is no 
other option.
Getting Expert Advisors to Answer Calls
Expert advisors are not contact center agents, and as mentioned previously, answering calls is not their 
primary job function. Various techniques are suggested under 
, for ensuring that callers do not wait for advisors for a very long time. Ultimately 
however, unless advisors are willing to pick up the phone, the enterprise’s business model will not 
succeed.