Cisco Cisco IP Contact Center Release 4.6.1 Design Guide
12-15
Cisco Unified Contact Center Enterprise 7.5 SRND
Chapter 12 Bandwidth Provisioning and QoS Considerations
Quality of Service
Configuring Queuing Policy to Act on Marked Traffic
Using the public (visible) network as an example, the class map below identifies two marking levels,
AF31 for high-priority traffic (which actually includes medium-priority public network traffic because
it is marked the same as the high-priority traffic by default) and AF11 for low-priority traffic:
AF31 for high-priority traffic (which actually includes medium-priority public network traffic because
it is marked the same as the high-priority traffic by default) and AF11 for low-priority traffic:
class-map match-all Unified ICM_Public_High
match ip dscp af31
class-map match-all ICM_Public_Low
match ip dscp af11
If the link is dedicated to Unified ICM Public traffic only, the policy map puts ICM_Public_High traffic
into the priority queue with the minimum and maximum bandwidth guarantee of 500 kbps, and it puts
ICM_Public_Low traffic into the normal queue with a minimum bandwidth of 250 kbps:
into the priority queue with the minimum and maximum bandwidth guarantee of 500 kbps, and it puts
ICM_Public_Low traffic into the normal queue with a minimum bandwidth of 250 kbps:
policy-map ICM_Public_Queuing
class ICM_Public_High
priority 500
class ICM_Public_Low
bandwidth 250
You can also use the commands priority percent and bandwidth percent to assign bandwidth on a
percentage basis, and 90% of the link bandwidth should be assigned to the priority queue.
percentage basis, and 90% of the link bandwidth should be assigned to the priority queue.
If it is a shared link, then you should use the sizing tools introduced in the section on Bandwidth
Provisioning, to calculate the bandwidth requirement at each priority level and add it to the allocation
for non-ICM traffic in the same queue. For example, if the link is shared with Unified CM ICCS traffic
and RTP traffic and they respectively require 600 kbps and 400 kbps, and if the link also carries the
private traffic in case of failover and the high priority and low priority private ICM traffic respectively
require 200 kbps and 100 kbps, the configuration would be:
Provisioning, to calculate the bandwidth requirement at each priority level and add it to the allocation
for non-ICM traffic in the same queue. For example, if the link is shared with Unified CM ICCS traffic
and RTP traffic and they respectively require 600 kbps and 400 kbps, and if the link also carries the
private traffic in case of failover and the high priority and low priority private ICM traffic respectively
require 200 kbps and 100 kbps, the configuration would be:
policy-map Converged_Link_Queuing
class RTP
priority 400
class ICCS
bandwidth 600
class ICM_Public_High
bandwidth 500
class ICM_Public_Low
bandwidth 250
class ICM_Private_High
bandwidth 200
class ICM_Private_Low
bandwidth 100
You can also use the commands priority percent and bandwidth percent to assign bandwidth on a
percentage basis. If the link is dedicated to Unified ICM traffic only, 90% of the link bandwidth should
be assigned to the priority queue. If it is a shared link, then you should use the sizing tools introduced
in the section on
percentage basis. If the link is dedicated to Unified ICM traffic only, 90% of the link bandwidth should
be assigned to the priority queue. If it is a shared link, then you should use the sizing tools introduced
in the section on
, to calculate the bandwidth requirement at each
priority level and add it to the allocation for non-ICM traffic in the same queue.
Finally, the queuing policy is applied to the outgoing interface:
interface mod/port
service-policy output ICM_Public_Queuing
Configuring Marking Policy to Mark Traffic
As discussed earlier, rather than marking traffic in the Unified ICM, another option is to mark traffic at
the network edge. First, define access lists to recognize Unified ICM traffic flows:
the network edge. First, define access lists to recognize Unified ICM traffic flows:
access-list 100 permit tcp host Public_High_IP any
access-list 100 permit tcp any host Public_High_IP