Alesis 7-51-0214-b User Manual

Page of 70
 
Getting In Deeper:  Recording
 
8
 
 
 
47 
3.  Archiving:  If  you’re capturing a special recording that may 
have some historical value in the future, it makes sense to 
capture it with the highest level of  technical accuracy.  
 
Alesis has designed your IO14/26 to sound excellent at all 
sample rates.  Decide for yourself  if  the benefits and 
tradeoffs are worth it for a particular session. 
 
 
 
The Downsides of High Definition Recording 
 
1.  Disk Usage – Recording at high sample rates consumes hard 
disk space much more quickly than standard rates.  The 
following table describes sampling rate vs. disk usage for a 
60-second snippet of  monophonic (1 track) audio: 
 
Length 
Bit Depth  Sampling Rate  Disk Usage 
60 Seconds 
24 bit 
44.1k   
7.9 MB 
60 Seconds 
24 bit 
48k 
 
8.6 MB 
60 Seconds 
24 bit 
88.2k   
15.9 MB 
60 Seconds 
24 bit 
96k 
 
17.3 MB 
60 Seconds 
24 bit 
176.4k  
31.8 MB 
60 Seconds 
24 bit 
192k   
34.6 MB 
 
You can see how this may become a problem on large 
musical projects.  For example, whereas a 5-minute song with 
16 channels of  24-bit audio would require up to 635MB to 
record at 44.1k, the same song would need approximately 
2.54 gigabytes of  storage if  you’re recording at 176.4k! 
 
We recommend that you take a look at your available hard 
disk resources when deciding which sampling rate to use.  
You can use the following formula to estimate the total disk 
space required for a song: 
 
Song length (in seconds) X Number of  Channels X 
Sampling Rate X 3 
 
So… Our hypothetical 5-minute song would be calculated in 
the following way: 
 
300 sec x 16 channels x 44,100 x 3 = 635,040,000 byes (about 
635 MB) 
 
That same song recorded at 176.4k would be: 
 
300 sec x 16 channels x 176,400 x 3 = 2,540,160,000 bytes (or 
2.54 GB)