DELL N3000 User Manual

Page of 1460
Configuring Data Center Bridging Features
1011
At time t2, a burst of LAN traffic is incoming at the rate of 4 Gbps, this burst 
is allowed to borrow the unused 0.5 Gbps bandwidth from SAN TCG and 
transmitted since the offered load of SAN is only 3 Gbps.
At time t3, when the offered load of IPC falls to 2 Gbps and the bursty LAN 
traffic is at 6 Gbps, the available bandwidth for SAN and LAN is 4 Gbps each 
according to the TCG weights, which are set as 50% each. However, ETS 
allows the LAN traffic to borrow unused bandwidth from SAN traffic, and 
then 5 Gbps of LAN traffic is transmitted.
Recommendations and Notes
Lossless traffic must map user priorities one-to-one onto CoS queues. 
Lossless traffic must always be carried within a VLAN-tagged frame to 
differentiate it from untagged best-effort LAN control traffic, such as ARP 
and LLDP.
Strict-priority CoS queues may starve other CoS queues of traffic if the 
offered load of the strict-priority CoS queues equals or exceeds the available 
capacity of the egress interfaces. It is recommended that either a CoS-queue-
level min-bandwidth setting be utilized to ensure a minimum amount of 
bandwidth is processed on the non-strict-priority queues if there is a 
possibility that the strict priority traffic is not limited in bandwidth by some 
other means.
It is recommended that the sum of the minimum bandwidth percentages 
allocated to the group of CoS queues mapped to a single TCG be less than or 
equal to the weight percentage, so that packets are not dropped due to the 
congestion in the TCG. 
The maximum bandwidth for a TCG should always be configured to be 
greater than the minimum bandwidth or the weight of the TCG. 
In the case where all TCGs are configured as strict priority, inter-TCG 
scheduling is Weighted Deficit Round Robin, using the configured weights.
Configuring CoS queues with a total maximum bandwidth that is less than 
the corresponding TCG weight will result in bandwidth being wasted in the 
secondary scheduler.
Configuring CoS queues with a total minimum bandwidth that is greater 
than the corresponding TCG weight will flood the secondary scheduler and 
result in the minimum bandwidth parameter effectively overriding the TCG 
weight setting.