Cisco Cisco Aironet 1572IC Outdoor Access Point Libro blanco
Copyright © 2015 Miercom Cisco Aironet 1570 Access Point
Page 4
Galaxy S4. At 300 feet, the Cisco 1572 delivers 40 percent more throughput to
a Galaxy S4 than Aruba's AP-275, and 58 percent more than the Ruckus T300.
At 1,000 feet, the Cisco 1572 delivers more than five times the down-link
throughput to a Galaxy 4S than either the Aruba AP-275 or the Ruckus T300.
a Galaxy S4 than Aruba's AP-275, and 58 percent more than the Ruckus T300.
At 1,000 feet, the Cisco 1572 delivers more than five times the down-link
throughput to a Galaxy 4S than either the Aruba AP-275 or the Ruckus T300.
Galaxy S5. At 300 feet, the Cisco 1572 delivered 28 percent more
throughput to a Galaxy S5 than Aruba's AP-275, and 43 percent more than
the Ruckus T300. At 1,000 feet the Cisco 1572 AP delivers 71 percent more
to a Galaxy S5 than Aruba's AP-275, and double
throughput to a Galaxy S5 than Aruba's AP-275, and 43 percent more than
the Ruckus T300. At 1,000 feet the Cisco 1572 AP delivers 71 percent more
to a Galaxy S5 than Aruba's AP-275, and double
– 109 percent more than –
the Ruckus T300.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300 Feet
600 Feet
1000 Feet
Mbps
Distance from Access Point
802.11ac Outdoor Rate vs Range - Galaxy S4
Average 5GHz TCP Downlink Throughput
Cisco
AP1572i
AP1572i
Aruba
AP275
AP275
Ruckus
APT300
APT300
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
300 Feet
600 Feet
1000 Feet
Mbps
Distance from Access Point
802.11ac Outdoor Rate vs Range - Galaxy S5
Average 5GHz TCP Downlink Throughput
Cisco
AP1572i
AP1572i
Aruba
AP275
AP275
Ruckus
APT300
APT300
The newer Galaxy S5
smartphone,
smartphone,
support-
ing two spatial streams,
achieved its best down-
link throughput average
of 362 Mbps, at 300
feet, with the Cisco
1572 AP. Again, the
performance delivered
by the Cisco AP was
considerably better than
the competition:
achieved its best down-
link throughput average
of 362 Mbps, at 300
feet, with the Cisco
1572 AP. Again, the
performance delivered
by the Cisco AP was
considerably better than
the competition:
On analyzing the Rate
vs Range data, it was
clearly apparent that
the smartphone clients,
when
vs Range data, it was
clearly apparent that
the smartphone clients,
when
connected
to
Aruba or Ruckus, start
struggling to maintain
the higher data rates
beyond the mid-range
of 600 feet.
struggling to maintain
the higher data rates
beyond the mid-range
of 600 feet.
At 1000 feet, Cisco
1572 AP managed to
keep up with the higher
data rate connections
which allowed for a
much higher average
throughput performance
for both the devices
even
1572 AP managed to
keep up with the higher
data rate connections
which allowed for a
much higher average
throughput performance
for both the devices
even
at
longer
distances.
We observed that the
average
average
throughput
performance for both of
the Galaxy devices at
1,000 feet with the
Cisco
the Galaxy devices at
1,000 feet with the
Cisco
AP1572
was
more than the average
performance with either
the Ruckus or Aruba
APs at 300 feet.
performance with either
the Ruckus or Aruba
APs at 300 feet.
Multi-Client
Performance &
Consistency
Performance &
Consistency
The
next
set
of
tests assessed outdoor
performance
performance
with
multiple
smartphone
clients of the same
type,
type,
concurrently
Source: Miercom, January 2015
Figure 3: Galaxy S4 Throughput at 300, 600 and 1,000 Feet
Figure 4: Galaxy S5 Throughput at 300, 600 and 1,000 Feet
Source: Miercom, January 2015