Manualsbrain.com
  1. Manuales
  2. Marcas
  3. Cisco
  4. Cisco WAP121 Wireless-N Access Point with Single Point Setup
  5. Notas de publicación

Cisco Cisco WAP121 Wireless-N Access Point with Single Point Setup Notas de publicación

Descargar
Página de 298
78-21145-01             Open Source Used In WAP121 1.0.3.x                                                                                                                                    50
Delchev, Andreas Schultz, Jeroen Massar, Wez Furlong, Nicolas Barry,
Justin Bradford, and CORE SDI S.A.
 
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files
(the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction,
including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge,
publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software,
and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so,
subject to the following conditions:
 
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
 
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE
FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF
CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION
WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
 
1.9 fakeroot 1.7.1 
1.9.1 Available under license : 
I suppose 'libtricks' will take the quest of finding border-cases for the GPL
yet one more (small) step forward. Does every dynamically linked executable
fall under the GPL once someone said `LD_PRELOAD=libtricks.so.0.0 executable'?
That seems to be a rather strange interpretation of the GPL.
The way I (as author of libtricks) see it:
 - you're free to link any program with this library and run it.
 - Only when you give away or sell copies of a program that is
   _set up_ to use this library (or needs it), that program will be
   considered a ``work based on the library'', and thus fall under GPL.
 
 
I've considered using LGPL, but I decided against that because
 - I still don't quite understand it's terms.
 - I actually don't want a program that really needs this
   library to be distributed with any other licence than (L)GPL.
 
joost witteveen.
 
 
For the tekst of the GPL, see /usr/doc/copyright/GPL of any debian system.