Cisco Cisco ONS 15454 M2 Multiservice Transport Platform (MSTP) Hoja De Datos
© 2011
–2013 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This document is Cisco Public.
Page 5 of 7
the network. The distributed computation model reduces DCN bottlenecks, because the exchange of GMPLS
information to compute optical impairments is between adjacent network elements supporting the optical path, with
final decision taking place at the egress node. This approach avoids an accumulation of information on the links
and nodes and being sent to the central server. The Cisco DWDM control plane provides the following services
and benefits:
●
Automatic DWDM network topology discovery
●
Automatic wavelength provisioning, including IP over DWDM (IPoDWDM) interoperability with GMPLS-UNI
●
Automatic path computation with awareness and validation of optical impairments and interface properties
●
Optical channel diversity based on LSP-ID and nodes, links, and Shared Risk Link Groups (SRLG)
●
Restoration
The DWDM-aware control plane becomes crucial when deploying IPoDWDM networks, because it provides unique
operational advantages and efficiency, making bandwidth-on-demand available to high-end IP networks, along with
optical restoration as needed and network and resource status. GMPLS UNI enables routers to dynamically
achieve LSP set-up, LSP tear down, diverse LSP request over UNI, as well as DWDM equipment to achieve
wavelength change on client DWDM interfaces.
Standards
The GMPLS optical control plane has been promoted by the IETF as an extension to the MPLS data control plane
(RFC 3945-GMPLS). Now the IETF Common Control and Measurement Plane (CCAMP) working group is leading
the WSON standardization effort, in conjunction with the ITU-T. IETF CCAMP and the ITU-T SG-15 joint liaison are
taking advantage of existing ITU-T standards work, such as G.680 and G.698.x, to advance the IETF Optical
Control Plane project.
The CCAMP working group is taking a two-step approach to the Control Plane for DWDM networks. First, it is
dealing with the pure routing and wavelength assignment (RWA) problem, which includes wavelength connectivity
and interface signal compatibility.
Routing and Wavelength Assignment Standards
The relevant standards (or ongoing drafts) include:
●
RFC 6205 Generalized Labels for Lambda-Switch-Capable (LSC) Label Switching Routers: This
standard defines an appropriate label format when GMPLS controls WSON networks.
●
RFC 6163 Framework for GMPLS and Path Computation Element (PCE) Control of Wavelength
Switched Optical Networks (WSONs): This standard defines the context, terminology, and architectural
options for a GMPLS control plane applied to WSON networks. As a framework, this is an informational
document and does not define any protocol extensions.
●
draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-info:
◦
draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode
◦
draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode
◦
These drafts are working group documents, and they are the basis for WSON protocol extensions.
Currently there are several ongoing discussions about information encoding. The ultimate solution is
likely to differ from the current draft content.
●
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te:
◦
draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf