BenQ Mobile GmbH & Co. OHG A31A Manuel D’Utilisation

Page de 55
45
U.S. FDA
right page (45)
 of A31a FCC us-en  (16.02.2006, 13:32)
© BenQ Mobile G
m
bH & Co.
 OHG
 2004
, Z:
\A
31_FI
NCH
_1\
outpu
t\FU
G
\A
31a_Finc
h_
FCC_
us-
Temp
late:
 X75,
 Ver
sion 2
.1
; VAR 
Language: am;
 VAR issu
e date:
 05071
1
• Occupational Health and Safety 
Administration
• National Telecommunications and In-
formation Administration
The National Institutes of Health also par-
ticipates in this group.
In the absence of conclusive information about 
any possible risk, what can concerned individ-
uals do?
If there is a risk from these products – and 
at this point we do not know that there is 
– it is probably very small. But if people 
are concerned about avoiding even po-
tential risks, there are simple steps they 
can take to do so. For example, time is a 
key factor in how much exposure a per-
son receives. Those persons who spend 
long periods of time on their hand-held 
mobile phones could consider holding 
lengthy conversations on conventional 
phones and reserving the hand-held 
models for shorter conversations or for 
situations when other types of phones 
are not available.
People who must conduct extended con-
versations in their cars every day could 
switch to a type of mobile phone that plac-
es more distance between their bodies 
and the source of the RF, since the expo-
sure level drops off dramatically with dis-
tance. For example, they could switch to:
• a mobile phone in which the antenna is 
located outside the vehicle,
• a hand-held phone with a built-in an-
tenna connected to a different antenna 
mounted on the outside of the car or 
built into a separate package, or
• a headset with a remote antenna to a 
mobile phone carried at the waist.
Where can I find additional information?
For additional information, see the fol-
lowing websites:
• Federal Communications Commission 
(FCC) RF Safety Program (select “Infor-
mation on Human Exposure to RF 
Fields from Cellular and PCS Radio 
Transmitters”): 
www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety
• World Health Organization (WHO) In-
ternational Commission on Non-Ioniz-
ing Radiation Protection (select Qs & 
As): 
www.who.int/emf
• United Kingdom, National Radiological 
Protection Board: 
www.nrpb.org.uk
• Cellular Telecommunications Industry 
Association (CTIA): 
www.wow-com.com
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration 
(FDA) Center for devices and Radiolog-
ical Health: 
www.fda.gov/cdhr/consumer/
1
 Muscat et al. Epidemiological Study of Cellular 
Telephone Use and Malignant Brain Tumors. In: 
State of the Science Symposium; 1999 June 20; 
Long Beach, California.
2
 Tice et al. Tests of mobile phone signals for activ-
ity in genotoxicity and other laboratory assays. In: 
Annual Meeting of the Environmental Mutagen So-
ciety; March 29, 1999, Washington, DC; and per-
sonal communication, unpublished results.
3
 Preece, AW, Iwi, G, Davies-Smith, A, Wesnes, K, 
Butler, S, Lim, E, and Varey, A. Effect of a 915- 
MHz simulated mobile phone signal on cognitive 
function in man. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., April 8, 1999.
4
 Hardell, L, Nasman, A, Pahlson, A, Hallquist, A 
and Mild, KH. Use of cellular telephones and the 
risk for brain tumors; a case-control study. Int. J. 
Oncol, 15: 113-116, 1999.