Emerson Liebert Economizer Solutions Fiche De Données

Page de 8
The effect of ambient conditions in representative cities on economization hours and resultant energy savings, using different 
economization methods (assumes cold aisle temperature 71°–80° F; CRAC return temperature 85° F). Cooling tower calculations were 
made with Liebert chilled water-based precision cooling products. Drycooler calculations were based on Liebert precision cooling products 
equipped with GLYCOOL option. Air economizer calculations based on 41.9° F dew point limitation.
Comparative hours of economizer operations through varying CRAC supply and return temperatures in three cities representing distinct ambient conditions 
(partial economizer operation = outside ambient used to precool or assist in cooling of data center return air).
3
Fluid-Side vs. Air-Side Economization Comparison
Fluid-side
Air-side
Advantages
 Compatible with moderate climates
 More operating hours than fluid-side economizers, if 
humidification is added
 Can be used on systems that don’t use water for heat rejection
 Lower initial capital costs
 Uses less water than fluid-side economizers
 Compatible with Liebert DS and Liebert CW precision cooling 
products (downflow only)
Challenges
 Ductwork required to get air into IT space
 Narrower range of effective hours of operation if used without 
humidification
 Dust and pollen sensors are required to minimize filter 
maintenance; humidity control can be costly and challenging
 Need proven, intelligent controls to ensure proper temperature 
and humidity
 High-density applications may require more localized cooling
 Mildew minimization actions required
Liebert Precision Cooling Economization 
In accordance with ASHRAE’s guidance, and in keeping with our position as the industry’s power and cooling leader, Emerson Network 
Power provides effective, efficient economizer solutions. Emerson Network Power offers fluid-side economization solutions and an air-side 
economizer – and Liebert technologies are well suited to work with economization solutions from third-party providers.
Advantages
 Can be used in any climate cold enough to provide effective hours 
of economization; Glycol-based systems operate effectively at 
the widest range of outdoor ambient temperatures
 Wider operating range results in 2x–3x more effective hours than 
air economizer systems in most climates
 No outside air is introduced to the data center, so the filtration 
and humidification functions of the CRAC unit operate normally 
to ensure optimal air quality and relative humidity
 Service requirements and complexities are reduced compared 
to air-side economizers; less filter changing and maintenance are 
required
 Compatible with Liebert DS, Liebert CW, Liebert Challenger 3000 
and Liebert XD precision cooling systems (downflow and upflow)
Challenges
 Indirect piping and control are more complex
 Higher initial capital costs
 Added water use for cooling tower
Atlanta
Chicago
Seattle 
Fluid Economizer
liebert 
CW or Ds 
with Air 
Economizer
Fluid Economizer
liebert 
CW or Ds 
with Air 
Economizer
Fluid Economizer
liebert 
CW or Ds 
with Air 
Economizer
Cooling 
tower
Dry-
cooler
Cooling 
tower
Dry-
cooler
Cooling 
tower
Dry-
cooler
Full Economizer Hours
25%
17%
18%
48%
41%
14%
39%
23%
27%
Partial Economizer Hours
52%
34%
33%
39%
28%
22%
61%
61%
15%
Estimated total Energy savings
51%
36%
34%
67%
58%
25%
70%
49%
34%
No economizer
Full economizer
Partial economizer
Potential dependant on dew point