Cisco Cisco Transport Manager 9.1 テクニカルリファレンス

ページ / 151
MTNM IMPLEMENTATION STATEMENT TEMPLATES AND GUIDELINES  
TMF 814Av3.0 
  TeleManagement Forum 2003 
11 
It allows several alarms to be sent from the same object, with the same probable cause, while still 
remaining identifiably different. (The alternative would be to manage unique values of the 
notification identifier, but some EMS vendors have problems with that.) 
Note that probableCause qualifier is not necessarily human readable, as its real purpose is to 
satisfy the second point. For instance, if the EMS works internally with a GDMO model, then it 
might use a GDMO probableCause and specificProblems attribute values (which are sequences 
of integers, not very exciting to read). The additionalText parameter is there to tell the human 
operator what is going on. 
Example 1
Consider a vendor that has a line terminal NE that issues the following native alarms from the 
same termination point and layer rate: 
   DegradedSignal 
   fecUncorrectedBlocks 
(meaning that our Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correcting algorithm 
has rejected some frames) 
Both these alarms are mapped to the generic probable cause BER_SD (i.e., "signal degraded"). 
The probableCauseQualifier, nativeEMSProbableCause and possibly the additionalText 
parameters distinguish between the two. Note that this saves one the trouble of going to TM 
Forum MTNM standards group and asking for a new probableCause value, and even better, it 
saves the NMS vendor the trouble of managing a new fault condition which from their point of 
view is equivalent to the other one ("a difference that makes no difference is no difference"). 
Example 2
Just consider all the equipment alarms that can be generated by all the equipment vendors. The 
MTNM interface designers intentionally use a single probableCause value “EQPT” for all of them. 
The implication is that it is not expected for the NMS to discriminate between hundreds of 
equipment conditions.  
2.1.6.2  Threshold Crossing Alerts (TCAs)  
One TCA template should be provided for each supported (or required) PM parameter for which 
the vendor supports thresholding or the service provider requires thresholding. As was the case 
for the probable cause template, a single Threshold template can cover several types of TCA 
(one TCA for each layer rate associated with a PM parameter). It should be noted that for a given 
PM parameter some parameters in the template may vary based on the layer rate. 
Table 2-7. Threshold Template 
Parameter Format 
Comments/ 
Clarifications 
notificationId 
FREE 
The notificationId is not guaranteed to be 
unique. However, if a vendor does 
support unique Ids, this should be noted.  
objectName FIXED 
 
nativeEMSName FREE