Cisco SG200-26FP SG200-26FP-EU プリント

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.  

This document is Cisco Public Information.

Competition Overview

Independent 3rd Party Lab Test

*

 (“Bake-off”)

Cisco 200 and 300 Series Switches versus HP E2620, E2810, E2520, E2510, E1810

Results

Cisco proven 

superior in: performance, 

usability, energy consumption, resiliency, 

price/ performance (overall value), 

advanced features

 

“ Cisco delivered the 

highest capacity 

and scalability”

“ The Cisco switches provided the 

best 

resiliency when subjected to a DoS attack”

“ Cisco switches can be seen as

 more 

economical”

“They were the 

most energy efficient”

“ The Cisco switches were the 

easiest to 

configure and implement”

“ …forwarded line rate full mesh traffic at all 

frame sizes with zero packet loss”

“ …provided the most 

extensive support for 

IPv6 transitions”

“ 

We were impressed with the comprehensive 

set of features, performance, overall 

power efficiency, and ease-of-use of the 

Cisco switches”

Cisco Advantages Over HP

HP E2620-24 (J9623A) versus:

•  More energy efficient
•  Zero touch—Cisco Discovery 

Protocol (CDP), Auto 
Smartports, Network 
Auto voice

•  Advanced capabilities—

VLAN Mirror, Q-in-Q, IGMP 
Querier, IPSG, MVR

•  Lower priced/better value

•  More energy efficient
•  True stacking versus 

HP Clustering

•  Zero touch—CDP, Auto 

Smartports, Network 
Auto voice

•  Advanced capabilities—

IPSG, Q-in-Q, MVR, 
VLAN Mirror, etc.

•  Lower priced/better value

* Information on competitor products is accurate to the best of Cisco’s 

knowledge and is based on commercially available documentation from 

competitors as of June 2012. Partners/customers are encouraged 

to verify information.

Cisco and the Cisco logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Cisco and/or 

its affiliates in the U.S. and other countries. To view a list of Cisco trademarks, go 

to this URL: www.cisco.com/go/trademarks. Third-party trademarks mentioned are 

the property of their respective owners. The use of the word partner does not imply 

a partnership relationship between Cisco and any other company. (1110R) 

C92-702605-01 7/12

HP E2910al-24G (J9245A):

•  More energy efficient
•  True stacking versus 

HP Clustering

•  Zero touch–CDP, Auto 

Smartports, Network 
Auto voice

•  Advanced capabilities—

VLAN Mirror, MVR

•  Time-based ACLs, Port 

Operation, 802.1x

•  USGv6/IPv6 Gold
•  Lower priced/better value

•  More energy efficient
•  True stacking versus 

HP Clustering

•  Zero touch–CDP, Auto 

Smartports, Network 
Auto voice

•  Advanced capabilities—  

VRRP, MVR, VLAN Mirror, etc

•  Time-based ACLs, Port 

Operation, 802.1x

•  USGv6/IPv6 Gold
•  Lower priced/better value

HP E2520G-24-POE (J9138A) versus:

•  More energy efficient
•  Zero touch—CDP, Auto 

Smartports, Network 
Auto voice

•  Advanced capabilities—

VLAN Mirror, Q-in-Q, IGMP 
Querier, ACL, IPSG, DAI, 
MVR, DHCP Snooping

•  Larger table sizes
•  Lower priced/better value

•  More energy efficient
•  True stacking versus 

HP Clustering

•  Zero touch—CDP, Auto 

Smartports, Network 
Auto voice

•  Advanced capabilities—

IPSG, Q-in-Q, MVR, 
VLAN Mirror, ACL, DHCP 
Snooping, DAI, etc.

HP E2510-48G (J9280A) versus:

•  More energy efficient
•  Zero touch—CDP, Auto 

Smartports, Network 
Auto voice

•  IPv6—protect your  

investment

•  Advanced capabilities—

VLAN Mirror, Q-in-Q, IGMP 
Querier, L3, DAI, IPSG, MVR

•  Larger table sizes
•  Lower priced/better value

•  More energy efficient
•  True stacking versus 

HP Clustering

•  Zero touch—CDP, Auto 

Smartports, Network 
Auto voice

•  IPv6—protect your 

investment

•  Advanced capabilities—

IPSG, Q-in-Q, MVR, 
VLAN Mirror, ACL, DHCP 
Snooping, DAI, etc.

For full report visit, http://miercom.com/pdf/reports/20120119.pdf