Cisco Cisco ASA 5580 Adaptive Security Appliance 백서

다운로드
페이지 6
 
 
 
IPS Testing 
 
VPN Gateway Throughput Performance
 
The results of the IPS tests are shown below and 
on the next page.  From a broad assortment of 
test cases, each involving a different category of 
threat, the Cisco ASA 5520 detected 100 percent 
of the threats in the test cases we performed. 
 
When testing the same test cases, with the 
competitive security appliances, many threats 
were undetected to varying degrees.  None of the 
other systems detected more than 45 percent of 
the collective threats in all categories. For 
instance, while the FortiGate 1000 detected 83 
percent of the Virus/Worm test cases, overall only 
29 percent of the total threats presented were 
detected.  The Cisco ASA 5520 detected all of the 
Backdoor threats, while surprisingly none of the 
competitive systems detected any of the Backdoor 
test cases presented. 
 
The IPS functionality tested included basic attacks 
that are typically included in most IPS tests, as 
well as additional test cases involving attack and 
threat mitigation, policy violation, and adware and 
spyware detection. 
 
A total of 126 threats (test cases) were presented 
to all four systems tested.  Each test case was 
executed separately for each system.  All the 
signatures (or any other IPS-type settings) were 
enabled for each system.  The results were 
examined using each system’s main management 
screen – these were web-based applications 
which were configured to display the attacks as 
soon as they were detected. 
 
Similar to the firewall performance, we evaluated
VPN performance using 4-Kbyte and 16-Kbyte HTTP
Object sizes.  Again, the traffic was generated by the
Spirent Avalanche/Reflector systems, simulating
HTTP-TCP/IP “real-world” traffic.  The VPN tests
were run with four VPN tunnels, simulating four
secure, site-to-site VPN connections, using 3DES 
encryption.  The VPN tests were run with only the
vendor’s default firewall settings enabled (no
additional settings were enabled). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
VPN 4-Tunnel Site-to-Site Performance (Mbps)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
       Cisco        
ASA 5520
    Juniper  
NetScreen-208
   Check Point    
VPN-1 Pro
     Fortinet   
FortiGate  1000
4k-byte Object size     
16k-byte Object size
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  The Cisco ASA 5520 demonstrated higher throughput
than competitors in the 4-tunnel Site-to-Site VPN tests,
with both 4-Kbyte and 16-Kbyte object sizes. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Threat Prevention by Category
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
   Viruses/     
Worms
Backdoors
General
P2P
IM
SpyWare
Overall
Cisco ASA 5520   
NetScreen-208   
Check Point VPN-1   
FortiGate 1000  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  The Cisco ASA 5520 detected 100 percent of the complete set of the threats presented, while comparable,
competitive systems from Juniper, Check Point and Fortinet only detected 30 to 40 percent of the cumulative threats. 
 
 
 
Copyright ©  2005 Miercom       Unified Threat Management Security Appliances                         Page 4