Cisco Cisco 5520 Wireless Controller 백서

다운로드
페이지 20
 
Cisco vs Aruba Wireless Controllers 
17 
DR150602D 
Copyright © Miercom 2015 
 
18 June 2015 
 
 
For the 40-MHz tests, channel overlapping was observed on both the vendors but varied in 
comparison. Cisco chose to overlap 2 of the 5 APs, while in Aruba's case all the 5 APs ended up 
sharing channels amongst each other. 
For the 80-MHz channel width tests, as there were only two channels to select from, both Cisco 
and Aruba had no choice but overlap the APs on shared channels. The AP distribution was similar 
for both vendors (3 on one channel, 2 on other channel) but the difference was in the overall 
power levels. Cisco APs had lowered the power levels more than Aruba APs to create smaller cell 
sizes in order to compensate for the heavy overlapping. This was determined as one of the 
reasons why even with the heavy overlapping for the 80-MHz channels, Cisco APs performed 
slightly better in terms of overall system throughput as seen in the performance comparison 
chart below.  
 
80 MHZ CHANNEL WIDTH SELECTION TEST 
VENDOR 
NUMBER OF OVERLAPPING APS 
CHANNELS OVERLAP PERCENTAGE 
CISCO 
100% 
ARUBA 
100% 
 
Cisco’s Dynamic Bandwidth Channel Selection is based on the Auto channel-width select feature.  
As shown, four 40-MHz channels and one 20-MHz channel were used by the five APs, with 
minimal overlap.  The result: less interference and better throughput.  
 
Cisco’s Auto Channel-Width Selection Visual Representation 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AUTO CHANNEL WIDTH SELECTION TEST 
VENDOR 
NUMBER OF OVERLAPPING APS 
CHANNELS OVERLAP PERCENTAGE 
CISCO 
0% 
ARUBA 
N/A 
N/A 
 
 
 
 
Source: Miercom June 2015 
CISCO RRM DBS AUTO