Cisco Cisco Email Security Appliance C170 사용자 가이드

다운로드
페이지 630
8-285
Cisco IronPort AsyncOS 7.1 for Email Configuration Guide
OL-22158-02
Chapter 8      Anti-Spam
Evaluating Anti-Spam Efficacy
IronPort strongly recommends evaluating the product using a live mail stream 
directly from the Internet. This is because IronPort Anti-Spam and IronPort 
Intelligent Multi-Scan rules are added quickly to prevent active spam attacks and 
quickly expire once attacks have passed. Testing using old messages will 
therefore lead to inaccurate test results.
Using the 
X-Advertisement: spam
 header is the best method to test if your system 
configuration is correctly handling a message that would be considered spam if it 
were “live.” Use the 
trace
 command (see 
Debugging Mail Flow Using Test 
Messages: Trace, page -446
) or see the following example.
Common pitfalls to avoid while evaluating include:
Evaluating using resent or forwarded mail or cut-and-pasted spam messages
Mail lacking the proper headers, connecting IP, signatures, etc. will result in 
inaccurate scores.
Testing “hard spam” only
Removing the “easy spam” using SBRS, blacklists, message filters, etc. will 
result in a lower overall catch rate percentage.
Resending spam caught by another anti-spam vendor
Testing older messages
CASE adds and removes rules rapidly based on current threats. Testing using 
an older collection of messages will significantly distort the results.
Example
Use SMTP commands to send a test message with the 
X-advertisement: spam
 
header to an address to which you have access. Ensure that the mail policy is 
configured to receive messages for the test address (see 
) and that 
the HAT will accept the test connection. 
# telnet IP_address_of_IronPort_Appliance_with_IronPort_Anti-Spam 
port
220 hostname ESMTP