Cisco Cisco WAP321 Wireless-N Access Point with Single Point Setup 릴리즈 노트

EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF

MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND

NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE

FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF

CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION

WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.

 

I suppose 'libtricks' will take the quest of finding border-cases for the GPL

yet one more (small) step forward. Does every dynamically linked executable

fall under the GPL once someone said `LD_PRELOAD=libtricks.so.0.0 executable'?

That seems to be a rather strange interpretation of the GPL.

The way I (as author of libtricks) see it:

 - you're free to link any program with this library and run it.

 - Only when you give away or sell copies of a program that is

   _set up_ to use this library (or needs it), that program will be

   considered a ``work based on the library'', and thus fall under GPL.

 

 

I've considered using LGPL, but I decided against that because

 - I still don't quite understand it's terms.

 - I actually don't want a program that really needs this

   library to be distributed with any other licence than (L)GPL.

 

joost witteveen.

 

 

For the tekst of the GPL, see /usr/doc/copyright/GPL of any debian system.

 

    GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE

       Version 2, June 1991

 

Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

    51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA

Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies

of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

 

    Preamble

 

 The licenses for most software are designed to take away your

freedom to share and change it.  By contrast, the GNU General Public