Cisco Cisco UCS B230 M1 Blade Server 백서
Cisco has more than 200 offices worldwide. Addresses, phone numbers, and fax numbers are listed on the Cisco Website at
www.cisco.com/go/offices.
Cisco and the Cisco logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Cisco and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and other countries. To view a list of Cisco trademarks, go to this
URL: www.cisco.com/go/trademarks. Third party trademarks mentioned are the property of their respective owners. The use of the word partner does not imply a partnership
relationship between Cisco and any other company. (1110R)
LE-43506-01 07/16
Americas Headquarters
Cisco Systems, Inc.
San Jose, CA
Asia Pacific Headquarters
Cisco Systems (USA) Pte. Ltd.
Singapore
Europe Headquarters
Cisco Systems International BV Amsterdam,
The Netherlands
Cisco UCS and Dell PowerEdge M1000e: A Comparison
June 2016
• All I/O devices must be in the same slots and must be the same models.
• Different operating systems may not boot correctly on different hardware.
• Different operating systems may not boot correctly on different hardware.
• ASM does not fully support hardware state abstraction. It uses scripts and
specifically defined parameters to create and move profiles between servers.
Conclusion
Cisco reinvented the server market five years ago when it delivered Cisco UCS.
It surpassed the capabilities of Dell, HP, and IBM at the time. Although Dell has
attempted to incorporate some of the innovations that Cisco has brought to market,
these attempts have been haphazard and have forced Dell into many compromises
that Cisco did not have to make. Although Dell has attempted to improve blade
server management over the years, its offerings require complex licensing and fail
to eliminate the limitations of the underlying traditional architecture. The result is that
even Dell’s most recent offering is still far behind Cisco UCS.
It surpassed the capabilities of Dell, HP, and IBM at the time. Although Dell has
attempted to incorporate some of the innovations that Cisco has brought to market,
these attempts have been haphazard and have forced Dell into many compromises
that Cisco did not have to make. Although Dell has attempted to improve blade
server management over the years, its offerings require complex licensing and fail
to eliminate the limitations of the underlying traditional architecture. The result is that
even Dell’s most recent offering is still far behind Cisco UCS.
Cisco has become the number-one x86-architecture blade vendor in the Americas
and number two worldwide. According to IDC, Cisco UCS forms the basis of the
some of the top integrated infrastructure solutions: Virtual Computing Environment
(VCE) coalition Vblock™ System and FlexPod. This achievement is the result of
the innovation used to design, build, and integrate the Cisco UCS hardware and
management software. This integration radically simplifies the infrastructure, helping
reduce both capital and operating costs, and delivers a solution with excellent agility,
flexibility, scalability, resiliency, and manageability and greatly reduced TCO.
and number two worldwide. According to IDC, Cisco UCS forms the basis of the
some of the top integrated infrastructure solutions: Virtual Computing Environment
(VCE) coalition Vblock™ System and FlexPod. This achievement is the result of
the innovation used to design, build, and integrate the Cisco UCS hardware and
management software. This integration radically simplifies the infrastructure, helping
reduce both capital and operating costs, and delivers a solution with excellent agility,
flexibility, scalability, resiliency, and manageability and greatly reduced TCO.
For More Information
• For more information about Cisco UCS, please visit
.
• For more information about Cisco UCS award-winning performance, please visit
• For more information about the Cisco UCS VIC 1340, please visit
• For more information about Cisco UCS Manager, please visit
.
• For more information about Cisco UCS Central Software, please visit