Ophir Optronics Ltd QSR 用户手册
Appendix C – Getting the most from the Quasar
Getting the Best Working Range from the Quasar
Getting the Best Working Range from the Quasar
The working range given by the Quasar device depends greatly on the working
environment (walls, obstructions, other radio equipment or electrical
disturbances in the vicinity) and on the orientation of the device relative to the
receiving radio on the host PC. Here are some suggestions for getting the best
range possible.
environment (walls, obstructions, other radio equipment or electrical
disturbances in the vicinity) and on the orientation of the device relative to the
receiving radio on the host PC. Here are some suggestions for getting the best
range possible.
1. For the standard model, the best range is obtained when pointing the
antenna towards the PC radio.
2. For the ER model, the best range is obtained when the antenna points
vertically, with the Quasar flat on a table-top.
3. Best working range is obtained with direct line of site between the Quasar
and radio on the host PC.
4. Walls and other nearby obstacles can cause reflections, so best results will
depend very much on the local environment. The Quasar should be
oriented until the best results are given in any given situation.
oriented until the best results are given in any given situation.
5. Operation should be possible through thin plaster-board walls or other
similar obstacles, with reduced operating range.
6. Bluetooth radio transmissions are robust, using frequency hopping
between 79 channels from 2.402GHz to 2.480GHz. If data is lost when
using one channel, the Bluetooth module inside the Quasar will try to re-
send the lost data on a different channel. However, interference from other
radio devices using the same frequency band such as cellular phones or a
WiFi internet connection may cause degradation in performance. If
interference is present, the maximum data logging rate when using
Pyroelectric or PD10 heads may be reduced. In addition, making the initial
connection between the Quasar and the PC may be more difficult.
using one channel, the Bluetooth module inside the Quasar will try to re-
send the lost data on a different channel. However, interference from other
radio devices using the same frequency band such as cellular phones or a
WiFi internet connection may cause degradation in performance. If
interference is present, the maximum data logging rate when using
Pyroelectric or PD10 heads may be reduced. In addition, making the initial
connection between the Quasar and the PC may be more difficult.
7. When working close to the maximum operating range, reduced data
logging rates may result, in particular when using Pyroelectric or PD10
heads. To get the best possible data rate, move the Quasar closer to the PC
radio.
heads. To get the best possible data rate, move the Quasar closer to the PC
radio.
8. When working close to the maximum operating range, the connection
between the Quasar and the PC may be sporadic or difficult to establish. It
is recommended to make the initial connection to the PC with the Quasar
as close as possible to the PC radio, and then to move further away if
necessary while operating the Quasar.
is recommended to make the initial connection to the PC with the Quasar
as close as possible to the PC radio, and then to move further away if
necessary while operating the Quasar.
Using Thermopile Head with Integral Quasar
Several models of thermopile head are offered with an integral Quasar device
mounted on the back. This option avoids having an extra wire between the
thermopile head and the Quasar device, making the device completely
"wireless".
mounted on the back. This option avoids having an extra wire between the
thermopile head and the Quasar device, making the device completely
"wireless".
See the Ophir catalog on our website (
www.ophiropt.com
) for more details of
heads offered with this option.
StarLab User Guide
109