Cisco Cisco IPCC Web Option Design Guide
2-36
Cisco Unified Contact Center Enterprise 7.0, 7.1, and 7.2 SRND
OL-8669-16
Chapter 2 Deployment Models
IPT: Clustering Over the WAN
•
The link should preferably be a dedicated circuit and not be tunneled across the highly available
(HA) WAN. See
(HA) WAN. See
, at the beginning of the section on
, for more information on path diversity.
Unified ICM Central Controller Private and Unified CM PG Private Across Single Link
A single link, shown in
, carries both Unified ICM Central Controller Private traffic and
VRU/CM PG Private traffic. Single-link implementations are more common and less costly than
dual-link implementations.
dual-link implementations.
Figure 2-17
Unified ICM Central Controller Private and Unified CM PG Private Across Single Link
Advantages
•
Less costly than separate-link model.
•
Fewer links to maintain, but more complex.
Best Practices
•
The link does not have to be redundant. If a redundant link is used, however, latency on failover must
not exceed 500 ms.
not exceed 500 ms.
•
Separate QoS classifications and reserved bandwidth are required for Central Controller
high-priority and PG high-priority communications. For details, see
high-priority and PG high-priority communications. For details, see
•
Link sizing and configuration must be examined before any major change to call load, call flow, or
deployment configuration. This is especially important in the single-link model.
deployment configuration. This is especially important in the single-link model.
•
The link should preferably be a dedicated circuit fully isolated from, and not tunneled across, the
highly available (HA) WAN. See
highly available (HA) WAN. See
, at the beginning of the section on
, for more information on path diversity.
Clustering Over the WAN with Unified CCE System PG
Clustering over the WAN with Unified CCE System PG is not supported due to the fact that a single
Unified CCE System peripheral is controlling all of the Unified IP IVRs and the Unified CM. The
load-balancing of calls between Unified IP IVRs does not take into account which site the call came into;
it simply distributes the calls to whichever Unified IP IVR is least loaded. This means that calls coming
into Site A might be treated by a Unified IP IVR in Site B. Additionally, both the A-side and B-side
Unified CCE System PG know about all of the Unified IP IVRs. PIM activation logic will determine if
the A-side or the B-side PIM will connect to each of the Unified IP IVRs. This means that the PG at site
Unified CCE System peripheral is controlling all of the Unified IP IVRs and the Unified CM. The
load-balancing of calls between Unified IP IVRs does not take into account which site the call came into;
it simply distributes the calls to whichever Unified IP IVR is least loaded. This means that calls coming
into Site A might be treated by a Unified IP IVR in Site B. Additionally, both the A-side and B-side
Unified CCE System PG know about all of the Unified IP IVRs. PIM activation logic will determine if
the A-side or the B-side PIM will connect to each of the Unified IP IVRs. This means that the PG at site
Site 1
Site 2
126029
PG A
ICM A
PG B
ICM B